sridatta1
Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 652
Location: india
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:45 am Post subject: Atheists criticize that Rama took wine |
|
|
Atheists criticize that Rama took wine
Rama and Krishna are not imaginary, - they are the absolute truth,
This world is imaginary for God, - the stone bridge in the ocean
Towards Lanka and the immersed Dwaraka traced now in the sea
Stand as historical proof for truth, - atheists are rigid stones,
No use of preaching to them, - like blow of conch shell before deaf,
Kauravas did not listen Krishna, - even several sages tried to change
Duryodhana, Krishna showed cosmic vision but every thing was waste.
Atheists criticize that Rama took wine according to Valmiki Ramayana,
Non-vegetarian food and wine are allowed for dynasty of Kshatriyas,
Even God follows the tradition of a community in which He is born,
Following the tradition, - He mixes with the community and slowly
Reforms the community, - it is like following the running bull initially,
To stop it after some steps, initial mixing is essential for preaching.
Same Rama was born as Buddha, - Buddha condemned that food and
Preached non-violence of all living beings opposing non-vegetarians.
Datta was born in the caste of Brahmins for whom wine is prohibited,
Still Datta drinks to mislead - devotees from their firm faith on Him,
Datta drinks to help undeserving, because undeserving cant be helped
According to law of justice and He forgets justice by drinking wine.
But these undeserving fellows criticize Him for drinking the wine!
These atheists should not have been born as human beings here,
If Datta doesnt drink wine, - these souls will be born as animals. |
|