sridatta1
Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 652
Location: india
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: The work must be different from inert energy |
|
|
The work must be different from inert energy
86) Na jadashaktireva kriyaabhaavaapatteh .
(We should not say that the work is simply the inert energy. If so, the new word, work, should not arise at all).
We can say that work is a form of inert energy. But we should not say that there is no difference between inert energy and work. If there is no difference between inert energy and work, what is the necessity of generation of a new word, work? The work must be different from inert energy and therefore a new word, work, is created. If you say that there is no difference between inert energy and work, there should be no work at all except the inert energy.
87) Ekatve na padadvayam na cha pruthagbhaavah .
(If both are one, there should be no two words and both should not have separate existence).
If work and energy are only one entity, there is no need of the generation of two separate words like work and energy. If both are one and the same, as soon as energy is produced the corresponding work also must have been generated simultaneously. There should not be two subsequent stages of energy and work. |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log
in to check your private messages
Log
in